Couples at risk of having a child with a mitochondrial disease are currently offered 3 parenthood options: conceive naturally and gamble with the risk of having a very sick child, use an egg donor, adopt. Therefore some people argue that mitochondrial donation is not strictly necessary. Should the time, effort and money used for mitochondrial donation be used on trying to find better treatments for mitochondrial diseases instead of being used in the prevention of children being born with them? Or, like many other couples who need assisted reproductive medicine (due to infertility) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (due to risk of passing a genetic disease to their descendants), mitochondrial donation should be offered as an option to those at risk?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this challenge
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.