We've heard about two different procedures for performing mitochondrial donation. As I understand it, in a spindle transfer protocol we extract a mother's membrane-surrounded spindle, which contains DNA, and a small amount of cytoplasm from an unfertilized metaphase II oocyte and transfer this into a donor's enucleated oocyte (Tachinaba et al, 2013). This would be followed by artificial insemination and IVF. In pro-nuclear transfer, first the mother's oocyte is artificially inseminated. Then the pronuclei, containing DNA from both the mother and father, is extracted from the zygote and the pronuclei is fused with an enucleated donor's zygote containing healthy mitochondria (Craven et al, 2010). Is there any reason to prefer one procedure over the other? Is one believed to have less risk?Or, is one preferable on ethical grounds? (Also, please correct me if any of those details are inaccurate!)
(Tachinaba et al - doi:10.1038/nature11647)
(Craven et al - doi:10.1038/nature08958)
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this challenge
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.