I am very interested to see what experts have to say about this recent opinion that points out the flaws with one example of Silicon Valley's attempts to disrupt medical testing outside the scope of peer-reviewed medicine: jama.jamanetwork.com/article.a...
“Stealth research creates total ambiguity about what evidence can be trusted in a mix of possibly brilliant ideas, aggressive corporate announcements, and massive media hype.”
The pros and cons of personal access to medical testing notwithstanding, how do we reconcile these instances where innovators create billion dollar companies without engaging in the peer-review process? Is this an issue about reconciling AMC and start-up cultures, incentives, operational structures or all of the above? Can the rise of physician innovators bridge this gap?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.