Dr. Weinberg, thank you for the comment that the "central tool of our trade is listening to the patient's story." Dr. Koven's essay suggests that listening to the patient's story is more than taking a thorough history; it is also a willingness to explore the psychosocial factors that may be contributing to a patient's illness. In contrast, some physicians argue that the psychosocial aspects of illness belong to psychiatry or social work, and that other specialities are responsible only for addressing their patients' pathophysiology. Do you or your colleagues share this latter viewpoint? If so, is it the result of not having enough time? What other factors beyond time prevent physicians from "taking the plunge"? If time weren't a factor, should non-psychiatrists be responsible for understanding and addressing the psychological and social factors that contribute to a patient's illness, or is this beyond their scope of practice? At the risk of oversimplifying this complex topic, is the ideal aim of medicine to respond to pathophysiology or to suffering more generally?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.