Thanks to everyone for some excellent discussion so far. Many have touched a bit on the idea of "cost effectiveness." While the cost of the Step 2 CS exam is quite clear, studies measuring its effectiveness are limited.
There are only 2 relevant studies to date. Winward et al. found a "modest" yet significant correlation between Step 2 CS interpersonal/communication scores & intern communication evaluations (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/235249...). More recently, Cuddy et al. found that Step 2 CS data interpretation score (based on written note) but not data gathering score (based on H&P) was correlated with intern H&P evaluations (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/263977...).
Furthermore, it's not entirely clear how to define "effective" in this setting. The lack of performance feedback limits the test's utility as an educational tool, but true purpose of a licensing exam is to protect patients by assuring all physicians meet minimum skills competencies.
My question is: How would one better study Step 2 CS to determine it's effectiveness? What is the "gold standard" for clinical & communication skills? What are the most appropriate outcome measures?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this challenge
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.